top of page

The Impact of Technology on Attention Span

AMAN BRAR

          If it seems harder for you to focus on a simple task now than it was only a few years ago, you’re not alone. The attention span of the average human being has decreased over the past couple of decades as technology continues to play a larger role in our lives. We are constantly bombarded with different screens, notifications, and haptics, all vying desperately for our attention; we are stimulated like never before. Social media algorithms are optimized to capture our attention, tailoring our experience to serve content that triggers the reward system in our brains, leading to dopamine release. 

                This creates a false sense of happiness and satisfaction traditionally associated with human social interaction. As this pattern repeats, addiction sets in: content is served, dopamine is released, and an algorithm-driven feedback loop is established. Consequently, if one disengages and suddenly loses this dopamine production, it can have a detrimental effect on their mental well-being. As this pattern repeats, addiction sets in: content is served, dopamine is released, and an algorithm-driven feedback loop is established. Consequently, if one disengages and suddenly loses this dopamine production, it can have a detrimental effect on their mental well-being.        

          Over the past few years, short-form video platforms like TikTok and Instagram have emerged as dominant forms of media. These platforms provide a continuous stream of bite-sized content, which is both easy to consume and inherently addictive. While they offer entertainment and a sense of connection, their detrimental impact on our attention span is becoming increasingly apparent. The fast pace and constant scrolling on these platforms train our brains to seek instant gratification and to consume information in brief, fragmented bursts. This, in turn, compromises our ability to maintain focus and engage in deep, concentrated thought. The continuous stimulation and dopamine-driven reward system encouraged by these platforms lead to a mindset that is both shallower and more easily distracted, making it more difficult for us to concentrate on longer tasks and reducing our overall attention span.

          Human attention and technology maintain a reciprocal relationship: technology impacts our attention span and is simultaneously influenced by our attention span's characteristics and limitations. Although it's vulnerable, human attention is a powerful mechanism with dynamic adaptability and selective focus, features mimicked by artificial neural networks. These networks utilize attention mechanisms to simulate the intricacies of human attention. Much as our minds focus on relevant information while filtering out distractions, these networks dynamically allocate their computational resources to specific sections of input data. By assigning greater weight or importance to certain elements, the attention mechanisms steer the network's focus, reflecting our capacity to concentrate on pertinent details. This attention-based approach enables networks to process complex data more efficiently and make informed decisions. By iteratively learning and fine-tuning, these mechanisms attempt to emulate the subtle patterns of human attention, forging a fascinating parallel between the computational domain and our intentional processes.    

          As our attention spans and ability to focus deteriorate due to addiction to social media driven by computationally optimized algorithms, we observe attempts to train neural networks to focus on tasks as humans do. However, these models are unable to replicate the evolving nature of human attention, influenced by factors like emotions, motivations, and contextual understanding. While attention mechanisms in artificial neural networks can allocate computational resources and prioritize relevant information, they lack the dynamic adaptability and profound depth of human attention. Human attention is a complex interplay of conscious and unconscious processes shaped by our experiences, intentions, and the ever-changing environment. Although neural networks can imitate certain aspects of attention, they fall short of capturing the complete richness and complexity of our intentional processes.

references:

Abraham Montoya Obeso, Jenny Benois-Pineau, Mireya Saraí García Vázquez, Alejandro Álvaro

Ramírez Acosta, Visual vs internal attention mechanisms in deep neural networks for image classification and object detection, Pattern Recognition, Volume 123, 2022, 108411, ISSN 0031-3203,

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2021.108411.

 

Burhan R and Moradzadeh J, Neurotransmitter Dopamine (DA) and its Role in the Development of Social Media Addiction. J Neurol Neurophy, 2020, 11(7), 01-02.

 

Paakkari, Leena, Jorma Tynjälä, Henri Lahti, Kristiina Ojala, and Nelli Lyyra. 2021. "Problematic Social

Media Use and Health among Adolescents" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public

Health 18, no. 4: 1885. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18041885

https://www.theguardian.com/science/2022/jan/02/attention-span-focus-screens-apps-smartphones-social

-media

https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-1758D

bottom of page